| IN A NUTSHELL |
|
In the realm of space exploration, the idea of a propellant-less drive has long been the stuff of dreams. The ability to produce thrust without expelling mass could revolutionize the way we explore the cosmos. Recently, a former NASA engineer and his company, Exodus Propulsion Technologies, have claimed to have discovered a way to achieve this. The claim is that their drive can produce enough thrust to counteract Earth’s gravity, a feat that would defy the laws of physics as we know them. This article delves into the fascinating story of this “New Force” and its potential impact on space travel.
The Birth of the Impossible Drive
The quest for a propellant-less drive took a significant turn in 2001 when British Electrical Engineer Roger Shawyer introduced the EmDrive. Dubbed the “impossible drive,” it was said to be reactionless, challenging the principles of physics, particularly the conservation of momentum. The scientific community greeted this claim with skepticism, given the revolutionary nature of such a discovery.
Over the next two decades, the EmDrive underwent extensive testing, with scientists eager to see if it could truly defy the laws of physics. By 2021, the consensus was clear: the EmDrive could not deliver on its promises. Despite the device’s failure, the pursuit of a propellant-less drive did not end there. Researchers continued to explore new possibilities, driven by the dream of unlocking a new era of space travel.
Miracle Down Under: Australian Patient Walks Free with Artificial Heart After 100+ Days
The Emergence of a New Challenger
As the EmDrive faded into scientific history, a new contender emerged, led by Charles Buhler, a former NASA scientist. Buhler’s work at the Kennedy Space Center’s Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory laid the foundation for his current endeavors. Now, as a co-founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies, he claims to have developed a drive powered by a “New Force” that operates outside the known laws of physics.
This innovative drive is said to generate a sustainable force through electric fields alone, allowing for center-of-mass translation without the expulsion of mass. Such a discovery, if verified, would fundamentally alter our understanding of physics and open up new possibilities for propulsion technology. However, Buhler acknowledges that independent verification is crucial to confirm these groundbreaking claims.
The Role of Electrostatics in Propulsion
Buhler’s journey into the realm of electrostatic propulsion began with his expertise in the field. His team, composed of individuals from NASA, Blue Origin, and the Air Force, has spent decades investigating propellant-less drives. Their efforts culminated in the development of a drive that, for the first time, generated enough thrust to overcome Earth’s gravity using electrostatics.
The key to this success lies in the discovery that systems with asymmetry in electrostatic pressure or electrostatic divergent fields can produce a non-zero force component. This means that under certain conditions, a force can be applied to an object without the need for propellant. Such a breakthrough could pave the way for new propulsion systems that redefine the limits of space exploration.
Sustainability Reports: Key to Transparent and Responsible Management
Navigating the Path of Scientific Scrutiny
While the claims of a propellant-less drive powered by a “New Force” are undeniably exciting, the history of such endeavors is littered with unfulfilled promises. The scientific community remains cautious, emphasizing the need for rigorous, third-party research to verify the results. The story of the EmDrive serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us that subsequent studies can often overturn initial positive results.
Despite the challenges, the pursuit of alternative propulsion methods continues to captivate the imagination of scientists and enthusiasts alike. The potential discovery of an unknown quirk of physics could unlock new frontiers in space exploration. For now, the world watches with bated breath as Buhler and his team seek to prove that their improbable engine is indeed a reality.
As the journey towards propellant-less propulsion unfolds, one can’t help but wonder about the future of space travel. Will the discovery of a “New Force” revolutionize our understanding of physics, or will it become another chapter in the annals of scientific curiosity? The possibility of redefining the boundaries of space exploration prompts us to ask: what other mysteries of the universe await our discovery?
Did you like it? 4.6/5 (22)
Wow, if this is true, we’re entering a sci-fi reality! 🚀
Using downed alien spacecraft, engineers solved anti-gravity in October 1954. In huge underground facilities in California and elsewhere, American aircraft companies have built and have been flying replications of the alien spacecrafts for years.
On YouTube look up Dr Steven M. Greer.
It’s not true, of course. Complete nonsense.
And the article reads like it was written by ChatGPT-3.5.
Funny thing, but when I was a kid, I and a group of neighborhood kids witnessed a military jet hovering overhead, silent and unmoving. This, in the 1960’s.
Is there any peer-reviewed paper supporting these claims?
Hahahaha Peer review the biggest joke out there…. So much has been kept back due to peer review… It’s a shoddy process that’s for sure
Sounds interesting, but I’m skeptical until I see independent verification.
How does this “New Force” compare to traditional propulsion systems in terms of efficiency?
I’m not sure unless I read the papers on it.
If successful, this could change everything we know about space travel. Mind-blowing!
Yes.
I believe there is something called free energy out there which the governments of the world don’t want us ordinary civilians to know about because they are making vast amounts of money out of petrol and diesel
Dr Steven M. Greer talks about this, and SHOWS EXAMPLES in “The Lost Century and How to Reclaim It” free on YouTube.
Oh dear not Steven Greer…
“Free” lol solar energy is free, tidal energy is free… equipment made to generate and store power from any kind of free energy source has production, maintenance, and other costs.
The only way any kind of energy will be be available for free is if everything was free.
This guy thinks he’s Tony Stark or something? 😂
Why hasn’t the scientific community been more vocal about this if it’s such a breakthrough?
Thank you for the comprehensive article, it’s fascinating to read about new possibilities in space travel!
Could this technology be adapted for use on Earth, like in transportation? 🤔
Hover board !!
Is this similar to the EmDrive, which was eventually debunked?
Did you even read the article?
The concept of thrust without propellant really challenges my understanding of physics. 🤯
What are the potential risks or downsides of using this technology?
I’m curious, how far along are they in the development process?
Sounds a lot like maglev to me. The Earth is chock full of magnetic materials – including its core. I wonder what it would push against in space?
This feels like a huge leap forward, if it’s real. Can’t wait for more updates!
This is how UFOs work, what’s the likelihood this team are being fed back engineered technology discerned from recovered craft, or directly from non human entitys themselves?
Has anyone else been able to replicate their results yet?
How does Charles Buhler plan to overcome the skepticism from the scientific community?
Humans are too grounded to earth to travel this way today…
Wow, could we really be on the brink of a new era in space travel? Exciting times!
Sorry, but this sounds too good to be true. I’ll believe it when I see it.
Wondering if it’s another hexalifter derivative..?
Another Ionic wind drive perhaps?
Yes, no doubt
What does NASA think about these claims?
I believe there is such a thing as free energy out there which has been derived from exsterrestial beings which the governments of this world don’t want us to have because they are making vast amounts of money from fossil fuels instead
I’m always amazed at how science keeps pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. 🌌
Is there any video or visual proof of this new drive working?
Let’s load up cern with some bismuth and see if we can find a mono pole
Hope this doesn’t end up like the EmDrive, getting our hopes up for nothing!
Is the “New Force” a completely new concept, or does it build on existing theories?
I believe there is something called free energy out there which the governments of the world don’t want us ordinary civilians to know about because they are making vast amounts of money out of petrol and diesel
How close are we to seeing this technology used in actual space missions?
Why aren’t more media outlets covering this story?
Because most of them main stream are corrupt and follow the lead of the intelligence services … Only takes a small amount of Brian power to figure that out
Are there any known side effects of using electrostatic propulsion?
Can this technology only be used in space, or does it have terrestrial applications as well?
Big claims need big proof. Hope they can deliver! 🤞
For reading an article on a science website, y’all sure aren’t understanding it. It literally says it needs to be tested further by independent scientists.
Let’s load up cern with some bismuth and see if we can find a mono pole
Whats the rush??
This technology has been re- engineered
Since the late 1940s , sorry that so many sheeple think its something new
Breaking NEWS, NASA Engineer found dead……
No explanation of the inner workings, no details of any papers this is linked to – in fact, no details of any kind at all. An empty article with no concrete information of any kind. May as well tell us to go and Google this random thing someone once heard a rumour about.
Classified if true, but to counteract gravity is the soul purpose of life for any intelligent species hoping to escape to a boundless sea of physical bodies and the life thats probably dwelling there already. The question is, will science or nature win and will those who have already conquered such physics allow us to journey there? I would keep it under wraps and not let the space people know we have that capability because I don’t know about you but I’m unsure of their motives at this point.
I would imagine that if the technology is scalable it would find it’s way in to all kinds of terrestrial applications. For example, air and ground transportation, drones, building construction, aerial platforms for everything from filming to launch vehicles, search and rescue, and of course military use. It would change everything and would be right up there with the discovery of electricity or the invention of the transistor.
Sounds a lot like maglev to me. The Earth is chock full of magnetic materials – including its core. I wonder what it would push against in space?
I’ve had many a discussion with academic friends on this subject for years and, if proven, appears to vindicate a long-held theory…
When a mass is set in motion, relative to an observer, time is dilated – generally by an immeasurable amount. The force used to move the mass is translated to relative time. We describe this in terms of observable ‘kinetic energy’, rather than by time dilation.
Now, instead of describing how much force is required to put a stationary object in motion, what if we were to consider time dilation instead, and how we might achieve it?
It is a long-held conjecture that creating a spinning electrostatic field (a vortex) could achieve this. Furthermore, if a human subject were in such a craft and subjected to the same dilated time of the craft, they would not experience the otherwise crushing G-forces under rapid acceleration. Now ask why/how unexplained inhabited craft (UFO/UAP/Whatever) can reportedly
manouevre at ‘impossible’ speeds.
However, I don’t believe we can expect to see such technologies emerge on the world stage anytime soon, particularly as there are many other things that could be realised with a ‘new understanding’ – let alone entire industries (based on conventional propulsion) obsolesced overnight.
We can however expect to hear that this is all fake news, or never really worked, like the Roswell ‘weather balloon’. So, whatever your beliefs or persuasions, we will never know. Hiwever, I am inspired to put my own beliefs to the test – for myself, rather than believe the cherry-picking nay-sayers, often dismissing such things with explanations more implausible than the probability that they don’t understand everything.
On that score, both ardent believers and skeptics alike do us no favours at-all, and I refuse to believe that clear personal observations of such craft, with friends, on two separate occasions, were the product of ‘mass-hallucinations’ and such.
The science community is a total laughing stock ATM you lot.look absolutely clueless half the time especially in comments… It’s like your not very smart at all but do everyone else’s science hahahaha most of you never find one thing new out but yet get your say on peer review hahahaha it’s so messed up
I expect they have been trying to back engineer this at Area 51 for years ,maybe they have cracked it from from the captured alien craft that they have got and had for years .
The truth is out there 😎
This has been out for hundreds of years and ive known about it for over 10. This isnt new its the controlling grip of oil companies being loosened
Cool, oil tankers in the sky,
I’ll believe it when I see it
Yeah, ok. This is another he said, she said. Terrible journalist. Where are the sources?
Complements to you.
Jetson Craft I call elroy and protective closier formulas are my past projects.
Clear up alien technology in 54. They lacked knowledge… Now God’s particle. Very appropriate!! Quantum..
Physics is being rewritten!!
Now working on military uses…
Damn. Someone may notice. More input, need data .. feed me. I’ll feed you and. ….
Again congratulations on the propellent.
Would like to follow a engineer with similar ventures.
I remain,
James A Russell Sr
Medium.com/@enuminous as this entirely depends on the efmw framework, I’m wondering when this engineer will publicly announce my contributions in physics and pay me?